NOTICE OF LIABILITY REGARDING TRESPASSING TECHNOLOGY

SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE, AGREEMENT AND DISHONOUR THIS IS A SELF-EXECUTING CONTRACT
 

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

 

Yet to be named.acting as role of those yet to be named and as the man/woman

Hereinafter:   Respondents/Libellees

 

hereby claiming all rights nunc pro tunc

Hereinafter: Claimant/Libellant

 

 

 

 

NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS / LIBELLEES

 

IT IS NOT MY INTENTION TO HARASS, INTIMIDATE, OFFEND, CONSPIRE, BLACKMAIL, COERCE, OR CAUSE ANXIETY, ALARM OR DISTRESS. THIS DOCUMENT AND ATTACHMENTS ARE PRESENTED WITH HONORABLE AND PEACEFUL INTENTIONS AND ARE EXPRESSLY FOR YOUR BENEFIT TO PROVIDE YOU WITH DUE PROCESS AND A GOOD FAITH OPPORTUNITY TO STATE A VERIFIED CLAIM.

PREAMBLE
NOTICE

Daniel Chap IV verse 17
This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demaund by the word of the Holy ones: to the intent that the liuing may know, that the most High ruleth in the kingdome of men, and giveth it to whomsoeuer hee will, and setteth vp ouer it the basest of men.

 

WHEREAS, it appears there is a global agenda to implement a so named “Smart Grid”; and

 

WHEREAS, it appears that there is an agenda of false information regarding privacy, cost, safety, health, security, billing modifications and other various concerns or considerations, due to the direct or indirect effects of the so named “Smart Grid” and or its components, including but not limited to the so named “telecell” “smart  meters”, “advanced meters”, non-transmitting digital meters and or related technologies with capabilities of emitting microwave frequencies and or transmitting detailed data of and not excluded to in-home activities relating to consumption of electrical, and or water, and or gas (components collectively referred to as "Trespassing Technology" and

 
WHEREAS, it appears the agenda of false information is being utilised to deceive unsuspecting utility owners/employees, government officials, lawmakers, public health officials, et al., or alternatively give plausible deniability to utility owners/employees, government officials, lawmakers, public health officials, et al that appear to be complicit with and or actively participating in the said “Smart Grid” agenda; and

WHEREAS, it appears that implementation of the so named “Smart Grid” and or some of its components, including but not limited to “telecell transmitters” “smart meters” and or “advanced meters” do in fact cause harm of various kinds; and

WHEREAS, it appears some or all of the various forms of harm caused by the implementation of the so named “Smart Grid” and or its various components, can be considered a tort and are compensable by law; and

WHEREAS, it appears there is no bond of record in existence, nor any source of indemnification  regarding the so named “Smart Grid” and its various effects that may be considered as causing harm of various kinds; and

WHEREAS, a person with full knowledge of a potential harm, whether caused directly by the person or not, and that person is endowed the ability and or duty to act upon the said knowledge in a way to avoid or otherwise mitigate the potential harm, and fails to do said actions, is liable for the inevitable harm caused, and or may be found negligent where there is a duty of care; and

WHEREAS, it is a fundamental principle of law that nobody is above the law including, but not limited to, all government actors. The government immunity clause only applies to government actors when they are performing their actions of their office defined by their office in good faith and that the Crown has made a ruling regarding public officials being held liable for actions done or failure to perform required actions, in the case of R v Bembridge (1783)

Claimant/Libellant, do hereby issue and serve by delivery, this instant contractual NOTICE OF LIABILITY REGARDING TRESPASSING TECHNOLOGY to the above named and unnamed Respondents/Libellees as the situation requires.

 

SITUS

Governing Law
This instant Contract, (hereinafter the “Contract”), initiated by Respondents/Libellees, is created pursuant to the signatories’ right of contract. You agree that no claim of interest in the Contract shall be assumed other than as expressly represented hereunder, and that the Contract shall be governed by and construed exclusively in accordance with the agreement of the parties as expressly stated hereunder. You agree that all words in this Contract are as the Claimant/Libellant understands them.

Restriction of Jurisdiction
Other than as expressly represented herein, you agree that no section of the Contract shall be assumed to constitute a voluntary election by any of the parties thereto to submit the Contract or the said parties to any venue of law, jurisdiction, court or tribunal, other than the agreement of the parties as stated hereunder. You agree that the Contract shall not be deemed to be subject to the laws of the Government, any State, political subdivision thereof, or any other legal fiction, procedural phantom, political construct, or any other jurisdiction, real or imagined, unless such election is voluntarily made in writing by the Claimant/libellant or his/her agent(s). You agree that no person(s) shall have any authority to control any decision regarding the Contract; no powers, interest or authority to amend, alter, modify or terminate the Contract are granted to any party, person, individual, agency, court or entity, real or imagined, other than as expressly represented hereunder, and no such powers, interest or authority shall be assumed; all such powers, interest, and authority being expressly prohibited hereunder. You agree that any representation by any party, person, individual, agency, court or entity, real or imagined, that any such powers, interest or authority exists shall be deemed a confession by the representing party/entity to joining the contract pursuant to the terms herein (see Joining the Contract) for which the Joinder Fee has been established herein at Ten Million United States Dollars per each such event.

Joining the Contract
It is agreed that a joinder fee shall be established in the amount of Ten Million United States Dollars per each action, of a party not named herein, which attempts to impair this Contract or stultify any of the parties thereto; and that this fee shall be due from said party. It is agreed that any party that fails to timely pay a True Bill agrees to a right of lien having been created and perfected against that party.

GUARANTEES & WAIVER OF BENEFITS

Guarantees for this instant action are the 1611 King James Bible, The Coronation Oath of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary: Windsor, Bill of Rights 1689, Constitutional Oaths of Office, The Common Law and Law Merchant, The Uniform Commercial Code, and case law.

The Claimant/Libellant does not claim any benefit of said Guarantees and are included solely as a reference to the law and conduct of named and unnamed Respondents. Bible references are exclusively from the 1611 King James Bible and are used due to oaths being sworn on it specifically, rather than the so-called “authorised version” which reads the same but is ‘technically’ different when written due to the spellings. The use of Bible references in this instant action are for jurisdictional purposes, and no adherence or non-adherence to any organised religious group, including but not limited to registered corporate organisations, on the part of the Claimant/Libellant may be assumed.

PLAIN STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. The Common Law is the highest jurisdiction of manmade law and jurisprudence for the men and women sojourning on the landmass commonly referred to as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

2. The Law Merchant is tied to the Common Law and is the highest jurisdiction of manmade law for the men and women sojourning on the landmass commonly referred to as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning commerce and associated contracts, bills, commercial instruments, jurisprudence et al.

3. The Uniform Commercial Code is a code accepted or partially accepted by agreement of the various jurisdictions regarding commercial contracts, commercial instruments, transactions, et al.

4. The Magna Carta is the supreme contract for the men and women sojourning on the landmass commonly referred to as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

5. The Common Law reflects the Laws as recorded in the group of books commonly referred to as The Holy Bible and is verified by Sir William Blackstone in his published Commentaries which were instrumental in the framing and establishing of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’s jurisprudence.

6. The past and present so-called Monarchs of United Kingdom Great Britain and Northern Ire-land must swear a corporeal oath and thereby contract to uphold and defend the laws as recorded in the letters patent 1611 King James Bible as well as the Common Law.

CORONATION OATH 1953

Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?

 Queen. All this I promise to do.

7. The Oaths of Office are clear regarding the adherence to the Laws of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. The wording of the oath is prescribed by the Promissory Oaths Act 1868. The form and manner of administering the oath are set out in the Oaths Act 1978.

8. For any Respondent/Libellee who has sworn an oath of office to true allegiance to Her Majesty  Queen Elizabeth II, Her Heirs and Successors, the Claimant/Libellant hereby accepts that oath of office, and any actions on the part of the Respondent/Libellee that are contrariwise to the Coronation Oath 1953, does, in fact, render the Queen’s oath in jeopardy

 

Numbers Chap XXX verses 1-2

And Moses spake vnto the heads of the tribes, concerning the children of Israel, saying, This is the thing which the LORD hath commanded.   2If a man vowe a vow unto the LORD, or sweare an oathe to bind his soule with a bond: he shall not breake his word, hee shall doe according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.

Leuiticus Chap V verses 3-5

Or if he touch the vncleannesse of man, whatsoeuer vncleannesse it be that a man shalbe defiled withall, and it be hid from him; when he knoweth of it,
then he shalbe guilty. 4Or if a soul sweare, pronouncing with his lips to do euill, or to do good, whatsoeuer it be that a man shall pronounce with an oath, and it be hid from him; when he knoweth of it, then he shalbe guilty in one of these. 5And it shalbe, when he shalbe guiltie in one of these things, that he shall confesse that hee hath sinned in that thing.

9. United Kingdom    Criminal Law Act 1967   c 58 Part 1 Section 3, states:

Section 3 Use of force in making arrest, etc.

(1) A person may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances in the prevention of crime, or in effecting or assisting in the lawful arrest of offenders or suspected offenders or of persons unlawfully at large.

(2) Subsection (1) above shall replace the rules of the common law on the question when force used for a purpose mentioned in the subsection is justified by that purpose.

10.  Trespassing Technology does harvest data about the activities of men and women in private dwellings without their consent. In January 2015, it was stated by Miles Keogh, a director of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, that:

“I think the data [from “smart” meters] is going to be worth a lot more than the commodity that’s being consumed to generate the data.”
(Originally published at http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/energy-electricity-data-use-113901)

11.    The implementation of the so named “Smart Grid” components, and or so named “telecell” “smart meters”, “advanced meters”, and or Trespassing Technology are IN VIOLATION OF THE GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION, see exhibit 2. No permission has or will be given for the harvesting of any data, past, present or future and under the Robert’s Rules of Order, notice is now served that all data collected must be removed and confirmation of this must be returned in writing within 7 days.

12.    Anyone or any one promoting any false information, manufacturing articles or devices, or participating in any manner regarding Trespassing Technology are in breach of The Fraud Act 2006.

 13.    When it is proven, by tacit agreement or otherwise, that Trespassing Technology, being implemented worldwide, originates from outside the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ; and or proven tacitly or otherwise that the “smart grid” agenda is an assault on the men, women and children of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, their real and other properties, wild and domestic livestock, pollinating insects which affect agriculture/food supply, right of privacy, well- being, liberty, or right to equitable contracts; and or proven tacitly or otherwise that any Trespassing Technology or the various “legal” actions used to implement it are contrary to, and a collateral or direct attack upon, the Coronation oath 1953 Crown, there may be grounds for indictment for treason.

United Kingdom/Britain/England the Treason Act 1945   CH 44

Deuteronomie Chap XVII verse 6

At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death, be put to death: but at the mouth of one witnesse he shall not bee put to death.

Deuteronomie Chap XIX verse 15

One witnesse shall not rise vp against a man for any iniquitie, or for any sinne, in any sinne that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be stablished.

S. Matthew Chap XVIII verse 16

But if he will not heare thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses euery word may be established.

II. Corinthians Chap XIII verse 1

This is the third time I am comming to you: in the mouth of two or three witnesses shal euery word be established.

To the Hebrewes Chap X verse 28
Hee that despised Moses Lawe, died without mercy, vnder two or three witnesses. [emphasis added on each item above]

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS TO CONTRACT
 

Point of Law
All contracts commence with an offer and only become binding upon acceptance. See: Farnsworth on Contracts, ©2004 by E. Allen Farnsworth, Third Edition, Aspen Publishers, ISBN: 9780735541429 (vol.1).

Binding Contract
This International Commercial Claim/Lien Within the Admiralty Private Agreement and Disclosures, Notice of Liability, with all attachments comprises a binding contract between Respondents/Libellees and the Claimant/Libellant for the purpose of establishing the honourable terms of the seller/buyer relationship you proposed, and eliminating faulty assumptions. It is referred to herein as the “Contract” although it is an inland claim which, when perfected, will constitute a lien against the parties as described hereunder. The terms “you,” “your,” and “yours” refer to each Respondent named and additional yet to be named respondents in the Contract individually and collectively. This Contract supersedes any and all previous agreements, whether expressed or tacit, between the parties.

Agreement & Waiver of Rights
If you agree with all of the terms of the Contract, you need not respond. Your silence will constitute your agreement and acceptance of all of the terms, statements and provisions hereunder as your complete understanding and agreement with the Claimant/Libellant and your waiver of any and all rights, remedies and defenses of protest, objection, rebuttal, argument, appeal and controversy for all time. You agree that your agreement, having been granted knowingly, voluntarily and with full disclosure, settles all matters finally and forever, and cannot be withdrawn.

Disagreement & Failure to Respond
You may disagree with any of the terms of the Contract by stating a verified claim with particularity (see stating a Claim below). You and the Claimant/Libellant agree that a response which is not verified, or a response from a third party agent lacking first-hand knowledge of the facts, will constitute your “failure to respond” as defined herein. If you fail to respond or state a claim by the indicated Effective Date, the Contract will become binding and fully enforceable in the admiralty venue as a maritime lien subject to levy, distraint, distress, certificate of exigency, impound, execution and all other lawful and/or commercial remedies.

Offer of Immunity—Stating a Claim
You may avoid all liability and obligations under this [1] Contract by simply responding no later than the Effective Date with a verified statement that proves any claim you feel you may have against the Claimant/Libellant or Claimant/Libellant’s interests. The statement must be sworn to be true under penalty of perjury and supported by certified factual evidence and verified proof.

Alternatively, you may respond with a point-by-point rebuttal of the Affidavit [2] sworn to be true, to which you attach certified factual evidence. In the event you decline this good faith Offer of Immunity, you agree with all terms, facts, statements and provisions in this Contract and your obligations hereunder.  

Administrative Remedy Under Verified Seal

The Contract constitutes the Claimant/Libellant’s administrative remedy pursuant to your offer(s) “to exchange electricity meters”. If you fail to respond or fail to state a verified superior claim by the Effective Date as described, you agree that the Claimant/Libellant has exhausted his/her administrative remedy (his/her procedure to negotiate a satisfactory mutual settlement) and has stated a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Opportunity to Exhaust Your Administrative Remedy
If you fail to state a verified claim by the Effective Date as described, you agree that you have failed to, and are forever barred from (“estoppel”), exhausting your administrative remedy, and therefore can never seek judicial intervention regarding the Contract now or at any time in the future.

Joining the Contract
You and the Claimant/Libellant agree that the joinder fee for any party not currently named on the Contract, seeking the privilege of joining the Contract, is hereby established at Ten Million United States Dollars per each attempt/event of impairment.

Terms of Response
As with any administrative process, you may rebut the statements and claims in the Affidavit by executing a verified response, point-by-point with evidence that is certified to be true and in affidavit form, correct and complete, to be received by Claimants no later than 5:00 PM on the Effective Date.

Non-performance
The terms “non-performance” and “failure to perform” are defined to mean failure to perform any obligation under this Contract on or before the Effective Date including, but not limited to, “failure to respond” to this Contract as that term is defined herein, failure to exhibit evidence of a superior claim upon request, purporting an unverified statement to be a claim, failure to verify a claim within twenty-four (24) hours of demand, failure to honor a pre-existing and or superior claim, and any other failure to perform an obligation under the terms and provisions of the Contract.

Failure to Respond
The term “failure to respond” means your failure by the Effective Date to respond to this Contract (silence) or “insufficiency of response” as that term is defined herein. You agree that failure to respond conveys your agreement with all of the terms and provisions of the Contract.

Insufficiency of Response
The terms “insufficiency of response” and “insufficient response” are defined to mean a response which is received by the Effective Date and which fails to rebut any of the established terms, provisions, statements or claims in the Contract, or offers blanket denials, unsupported rebuttals, inapposite rebuttals such as “not applicable” or equivalent statements, declarations of counsel and or other third parties who lack first-hand material factual knowledge, and or any rebuttal which lacks verification or an equivalent level of risk or fails to exhibit supportive evidence certified to be true, correct and complete under full commercial liability. You agree that any such response is deemed to be legally and lawfully insufficient to rebut the established statements in the Contract, thereby conveying your agreement with all of the terms and provisions of the Contract.

Tacit Agreement
You may admit to all statements and claims in the Contract by simply remaining silent. The parties herein agree that failure to respond or insufficiency of response as defined herein constitutes agreement with all terms, provisions, statements, facts and claims in the Contract. 

qui tacet consentire videtur

 “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading…” U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299 (1977), quoting U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032  (1970).

“When circumstances impose duty to speak and one deliberately remains silent, silence is equivalent to false representation.” Fisher Controls International, Inc. v. Gibbons, 911 S.W. 2d 135 (1995).

 “When a person sustains to another a position of trust and confidence, his failure to disclose facts that he has a duty to disclose is as much a fraud as an actual misrepresentation.” Blanton v. Sherman Compress Co., 256 S.W. 2d 884 (1953).

Silence activates estoppel, pursuant to Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.

UCC Section 2--201. Formal Requirements; Statute of Frauds.

(1)    Except as otherwise provided in this section a contract for the sale of goods for the price of $500 or more is not enforceable by way of action or defense unless there is some writing sufficient to indicate that a contract for sale has been made between the parties and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought or by his authorized agent or broker....

(2)  Between merchants if within a reasonable time a writing in confirmation of the contract and sufficient against the sender is received and the party receiving it has reason to know its contents… it satisfies the requirements of subsection (1) against such party unless written notice of objection to its contents is given within ten days after it is received. [emphasis added]

Conditional Acceptance

The offer(s) from Respondent(s) to install a so named “telecell” “smart meter”, “advanced meter” or any other name to describe one or more components of the so called “Smart Grid” at or near the private dwelling and or workplace of the Claimant/Libellant is the commencement of a contract negotiation, or meeting of the minds. The Contract becomes binding upon unconditional acceptance or performance.

Performance and Acceptance of Offer to Contract under Reservation of Rights
The Claimant/Libellant reserves the right not to be compelled to perform under any contractual agreement that has not been fully disclosed in the prescribed form as herein claimed.

Terms of Conditional Acceptance

Claimant/Libellant, hereby notices Respondents/Libellees that your offer to contract is formally conditionally accepted under reservation of all immutable and natural rights nunc pro tunc without prejudice whether expressed or not, and upon full disclosure of any and all perils involved with the so named “Smart Grid” and any of its components, and upon a point-by-point rebuttal of the attached affidavit, to which you attach certified factual evidence sworn to be true.

If the Respondent/Libellee should fail to meet the requirements as defined in the section Insufficiency of Response, it shall constitute your full agreement with the following contractual terms in all jurisdictions:

1.“Smart Grid” components, and or so named “telecell transmitter”  “smart meters”, “advanced meters”, “AMI” and or Trespassing Technology (as defined herein), must not be installed at or near the private and or workplace of the Claimant/Libellant:

2. The Claimant/Libellant consents to only (an) analog meter(s), with no digital components, no switching mode power supply, no data recorder and no transmitter. Any other meter type does constitute Trespassing Technology and does cause harm.

3. In a case where Trespassing Technology has already been installed without express consent, the original service contract between the utility and the account holder is deemed to have been breached, and therefore of-fending parties involved are subject to lawful remedies for breach of that contract.

4. Respondents/Libellees accept full liability for any and all harm or loss caused by Trespassing Technology, for which remedy may be sought according to tort law, criminal law, strict liability, negligence and or ultrahazardous activity.

5. “Smart Grid” components, and or so named “telecell” “smart meters”, “advanced meters” and or Trespassing Technology, if already installed at or near the private dwelling and or workplace of the Claimant/Libellant, must be removed within 7 days of the date of Binding Administrative Judgment as defined herein.

6. “Smart Grid” components, and or so named “telecell” “smart meters”, “advanced meters”, and or Trespassing Technology, if already installed, and not removed within 7 days of the date of Binding Administrative Judgment as defined herein, may be removed by others, and the cost of removal shall be charged to Respond-ents/Libellees.

7. Utility service shall not be altered nor discontinued without specific written instruction from the Claimant/Libellant directing the utility to take such action.

8. In the case of a “telecell” “smart meter”, “advanced meter”, and or Trespassing Technology changed back to a previously authorised analog meter prior to receiving this notice, utility service shall not be altered or discon-tinued.

9. No additional fees may be charged to the Claimant/Libellant for not receiving a so named “tele-cell” “smart meter”, “advanced meter”, and or Trespassing Technology.

 

 

per day for any Trespassing Technology installed near the Claimant/Libellant’s private dwelling and or workplace, shall be due and payable from the Respondent/Libellee to the Claimant/Libellant, or to another recipient or organization if specified in writing by the Claimant/Libellant.

11. In the case of failure to pay any fees within thirty days of presentment of a True Bill, you agree to a lien against you, subject to levy, distraint, distress, certificate of exigency, impound, execution and all other lawful and or commercial remedies.

12. Aiding and abetting the implementation of so named “Smart Grid”, and or so named “telecell” “smart meters”, “advanced meters”, and or any other Trespassing Technology is an act of Treason for those under oath to the Crown.

NOTICE

RESPONSE MUST BE BY THE EFFECTIVE DATE, WHICH IS FOURTEEN (14) DAYS FROM THE POSTMARK DATE OF THIS CONTRACT.

RESPONSE MUST BE TO THE POSTAL LOCATIONS OF THE TWO WITNESSES:

ABATEMENT OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
If the Respondents/Libellees its co-parties and officers discover any errors or omissions, legal or otherwise, in or related to this instrument, said agents, officers and co-parties are required to notice the Claimant/Libellant at the required postal location(s), by Registered or Certified Mail, with a point-by-point description of any such errors and omissions or defects for correction within three (3) days of receiving this Notice, or forever admit the lawful execution of this Notice as a matter of the public record.
If additional time is required for responding, a request must be received by the Claimant/Libellant in the prescribed form at the postal locations herein within the three (3) days allotted or be forever barred from contest under the doctrine or maxim of Collateral Estoppel.

TRESPASS UPON PRIVATE CONTRACT
Any collateral attack on this Contract is in bad faith and is a criminal trespass.

AGREEMENT AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS
If the Respondents/Libellees agree with all of the statements herein, a response is not necessary.

If Respondents/Libellees choose to remain silent, Respondents/Libellees agree and accept all of the terms, statements and provisions herein as their complete understanding and agreement with Claimant/Libellant and their waiver of any and all immunities, rights, remedies and defences of protest, objection, rebuttal, argument, appeal and controversy for all time.

Tacit Agreement
Respondents/Libellees may admit to all statements and claims in this Notice which comprises a binding contract by simply remaining silent.

Statute Staple
This Contract is instantly self-executing upon issuance due to the failure by Respondents/Libellees to respond or perform as defined above. Respondents/Libellees agree to be bound by all of the terms of the Contract commencing on the date of default.

Confession of Judgment - Binding Administrative Judgment
The Respondents/Libellees are entitled to a Notice of Default. In consideration, Respondents/Libellees agrees to accept a Notice of Default as Binding Administrative Judgment (“Judgment”) certifying Respondents/Libellees agreement with all terms, statements, facts and provisions in the Contract. Since Judgment is issued when a party waives the right to respond, all parties to this Agreement agree to be bound in perpetuity by any and all such Judgments which may be issued regarding the Contract.

The Respondents/Libellees cannot directly or indirectly seek recoupment of losses incurred, due to any terms of this Contract, from their customers or constituents. Any Respondent/Libellee will be absolved of all liability, including all outstanding amounts billed, when all Trespassing Technology is removed from the service area or constituency, as the case may be, of that Respondent/Libellee.

 

CONCLUSION
The Respondents/Libellees have been served this notice, including but not limited to the enclosed Exhibits, Affidavit and Bill of Lading, all of which constitute full disclosure of the so named “Smart Grid” agenda as of the date of this notice. This notice in full will be made available to anyone who chooses to use it in a subsequent claim regarding Trespassing Technology and any effect thereof, directly or indirectly causing harm of any kind to anyone or anything.

Respectfully, govern yourself accordingly.

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal; Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

As Above so below
It is written, “If they refuse to take the cup at thine hand to drinke, then shalt thou say vnto them, Thus saith the Lord of hosts, Yee shall certainely drinke.”
“Thy kingdome come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heauen.”

 

herein “Claimant/Libellant,” do herewith affirm and declare

under my unlimited commercial liability that I am competent and of lawful age to state the matters set forth herein, that they are true, correct, complete, not intended to be misleading, they are admissible as evidence, and in accordance with my best firsthand knowledge, understanding and belief.

 

All rights reserved without prejudice

before me, the undersigned notary public, appeared                                                 

known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the one whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged execution of the same for the purposes therein contained.

In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

NOTARY PUBLIC

AFFIDAVIT

hereinafter “Affirmant”, does solemnly affirm, declare and state as follows:

1. Affirmant is competent to state the matters set forth herein.

2. Affirmant has knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. All the facts herein are true, correct, complete and admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a wit-ness, Affirmant will testify to their veracity.

Plain Statement of Facts

4. Many utilities and public bodies are installing or have installed so named “telecell” “smart” or “advanced” digital utility meters and related network technologies which
a. can record and transmit data for the purpose of surveillance of personal activities in the private dwellings and or workplaces of all utility customers without disclosure or consent;
b. do unlawfully emit high-energy density pulsed microwave frequencies harmful to biological organisms and or emit waste electricity in the form of voltage transients (aka “dirty electricity”) also harmful to biological organisms; and
c. have been demonstrated to cause fires, cause hacking vulnerability, and facilitate erroneously high custom-er utility bills.This technology is referred to collectively as “Trespassing Technology”.

5. The Trespassing Technology is designed with the explicit capability and intention to extract information from within private dwellings and or workplaces, about specific appliance usage details and other data per-taining to activities of the living occupants.
a. A U.S. Congressional Research report entitled “Smart "Meter Data Privacy and Cybersecurity” (February 3, 2012) states, “With smart meters, police will have access to data that might be used to track residents’ daily lives and routines while in their homes, including their eating, sleeping, and showering habits, what appliances they use and when, and whether they prefer the television to the treadmill, among a host of other details.

b. A senior official with the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) admitted in an interview with Politico.com (January 1, 2015), “I think the data [of in-home activities, harvested via so named “smart meters”] is going to be worth a lot more than the commodity that’s being consumed [electricity] to generate the data.”

c. In 2016, a major “smart” meter data aggregator with , Onzo Ltd (UK), released a marketing video which stated, “We use this characterized profile to give the utility… the ability to monetize their customer data by providing a direct link to appropriate third-party organizations based on the customer’s identified character.”

 

6. Installation and use of any surveillance and activity monitoring device that sends and receives commu-nications technology is hereby refused and prohibited. Consent is legally required for installation of any surveillance device and any device that will collect and transmit private and personal data to undis-closed and unauthorised parties for undisclosed and unauthorised purposes. Authorisation for sharing of personal and private information may only be given by the originator and subject of that information and in violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) (EU) 2016/679 and the 2006 Fraud Act.

7. The Trespassing Technology violates many of my human rights, such as those laid out by the European Convention on Human Rights under Article 1 of the First Protocol, Article 2 (right to life), Article 3 (prohibition of torture/degrading treatment), Article 5 (right to liberty and security), Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and

8. The Trespassing Technology and related infrastructure is either mounted on or is adjacent to private property, including but not limited to bodies of living men and women, without first acquiring their explicit consent.

9. Living occupants in private dwellings and or workplaces are not being justly compensated, nor consulted, nor even informed, of their private property being utilized as a relay station for the networks related to the Trespassing Technology.

10. The Trespassing Technology creates a previously non-existent vulnerability and diminishes pri-vate dwelling and or workplace security by functioning as an unsecured wireless digital gateway into the private dwelling and or workplace. The living men and women occupying the private dwelling and or workplace become subject to whatever the desires of a utility, government, or hacker who wishes to remotely interrupt or control the supply of energy to appliance(s) within the private dwelling and or workplace, or to the entire private dwelling and or workplace itself. Unauthorised access, and all of its consequences, becomes fully the liability of the utility and or public bodies - for the unauthorised installation and all resulting harm, damage, injury and loss of rights.

11. The Trespassing Technology can create measurable voltage transients, also known as dirty elec-tricity, on existing electrical wiring, at levels that are harmful and damaging to all biological or-ganisms. This also causes systemic inaccuracies in billing, resulting in electricity customers pay-ing unjust amounts for unused, or wasted, energy. As a result of wasted energy caused by voltage transients due to Trespassing Technology, ground voltage has also been measured to be increased in areas where Trespassing Technology is deployed. This is also harmful and damaging to all bio-logical organisms.

12. The Trespassing Technology can cause home fires, which have already resulted in deaths of men and women, in Vacaville (California), Dallas (Texas) and Reno (Nevada).

13. Due to fire and safety risks, PECO ENERGY CO (Pennsylvania) announced removal of 96,000 so named “smart meters” in 2012; the PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN (Canada) announced removal of all of their 105,000 so named “smart meters” in 2014; PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC (Oregon) announced removal of 70,000 so named “smart meters” in 2014; and the CITY OF LAKELAND (Florida) announced removal of more than 10,000 so named “smart meters” in 2014. In 2015, thousands of so named “smart meters” simultaneously exploded in Stockton (California).

 14. The Trespassing Technology has caused disruptive interference that has resulted in injuries to living occu-pants including, but not limited to, men and women with medical implants, and the interference has not yet been mitigated in any meaningful way, as of this writing. Factual notice of harm caused by the emissions from the Trespassing Technology has been abundantly given to power companies, and the violations con-tinue deliberately, and intentionally.

 

15. The Trespassing Technology transmits pulsed microwave radiation into and throughout private property, including but not limited to bodies of living men and women, without first acquiring their explicit consent. According to a vast body of published science, microwave radiation is proven to be harmful and damaging to all biological organisms, down to the cellular and molecular level, at relatively low power densities. Electromagnetic frequencies, when emitted from microwaves and x-ray machines, are shielded from hu-man contact. Even cell phone manuals state a required separation between one’s body and the device. Tres-passing Technology has been measured to emit pulsed radiation between hundreds and tens of thousands of times greater intensity than cell phones, and as direct result, there are at least thousands of reports of indi-viduals suffering functional impairment and or illness since the installation of Trespassing Technology where they live. Because Trespassing Technology is known to emit radiation without any warnings and without any shielding, this exposes all occupants to undisclosed electromagnetic radiation emissions and puts them in tangible and high risk of harm and injury.

16. Industry claims that the Trespassing Technology is “safe” or “harmless” are false and misleading; and are based on training, propaganda techniques, and the time-averaging of pulsed emissions, rather than the emission values of the pulses. Such claims of industry are not based on science. In addition, the problem of harm from voltage transients remains, significantly, unaddressed by power companies.

Several thousand scientific studies have concluded there are biological effects from exposure to electro-magnetic frequencies at power densities lower than is emitted by the Trespassing Technology. Claims by power company and government employees that the Trespassing Technology is harmless, are self-serving and fraudulent.

17. A significant number of government agencies have released statements confirming that agencies such as the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Health Canada and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation (ICNIRP) have "safety" guidelines for microwave radiation exposure which are in-sufficient for functioning as a guideline, because they are based solely on thermal effect, and do not take into account any of the body of several thousand published, peer-reviewed scientific studies showing harm-ful non-thermal effects. These include, but are not limited to:

a. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1993: The FCC’s exposure standards are “seriously flawed.” (Official comments to the FCC on guidelines for evaluation of electromagnetic effects of radio frequen-cy radiation, FCC Docket ET 93-62, November 9, 1993.)

b. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 1993: “FCC rules do not address the issue of long-term, chronic exposure to RF fields.” (Comments of the FDA to the FCC, November 10, 1993.)

c. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1994: The FCC’s standard is inadequate because it “is based on only one dominant mechanism — adverse health effects caused by body heating.” (Comments of NIOSH to the FCC, January 11, 1994.)

d. Amateur Radio Relay League Bio-Effects Committee, 1994: “The FCC’s standard does not protect against non-thermal effects.” (Comments of the ARRL Bio-Effects Committee to the FCC, January 7, 1994.)

e. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2002: Norbert Hankin of the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation, Center for Science and Risk Assessment, Radiation Protection Division, wrote: “The FCC’s current [radio frequency/microwave] exposure guidelines, as well as those of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the International Commission on Non-ionising Radiation Protection, are ther-mally based, and do not apply to chronic, non-thermal exposure situations…. The generalisation by many that the guidelines protect human beings from harm by any or all mechanisms is not justified…. There are reports that suggest that potentially adverse health effects, such as cancer, may occur…. Federal health and safety agencies have not yet developed policies concerning possible risk from long- term, non-thermal exposures.”

 

f. The U.S. Department of Interior, 2014: “Study results have documented [bird] nest and site abandon-ment, plumage deterioration, locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, and death.... The electro-magnetic radiation standards used by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continue to be based on thermal heating, a criterion now nearly 30 years out of date and inapplicable today.”

g. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Reduction of EMF exposure. This should include all types of EMF exposures rele-vant to the person, especially during sleep at work see Chapter “Reduction of EMF Exposure”.For more in-formation,see e.g“Options to Minimize EMF/RF/Static Field Exposures in Office Environment” (268) and “Elektrosmogim Appeal” (269).

h. On 6th May 2011 the Council of Europe issued a report titled “Potential dangers of EMF’s

i. Wireless ‘Smart’ Meters, when activated, emit intense, pulsed bursts of non-ionising, RF microwave radia-tion. More than 5,000 studies have shown that non-ionising microwave radiation/RF EMF is harmful to hu-mans, animals and plants.

j. On 31st May 2011, the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) categorised RF EMFs as a possible CARCINOGEN (Class 2b) – the same as lead, DDT, chloroform & methylmercury.

 

k. On 6th May 2011, the Council of Europe issued a report titled “Potential dangers of EMFs and their effect on the environment” in which they called for an IMMEDIATE reduction in exposure to EMFs by children. The Council advocates a precautionary principle be applied to wireless emissions to prevent public health disaster akin to “tobacco, leaded petrol and asbestos”. ‘Smart’ Meters will increase – not decrease – the EMF expo-sure to members of a household and their neighbours.

l. As demonstrated by Daniel Hirsch, Senior Nuclear Policy Lecturer at UCSC, ‘Smart’ Meters can expose the body to 160x to 800x times as much microwave radiation as mobile phones. ‘Smart’ Meters can emit intense pulses of radiation in excess of 190,000 times every day.

m. Human, animal and cell culture studies indicate long-term systemic health effects from RF microwave radia-tion, including hormone disruption, DNA damage, leakage of blood-brain- barrier, sperm count reduction & damage, sleep disorders, learning difficulties, attention deficit & hyperactivity disorders, dementia and cancer including leukemia and brain glioma (tumours). There is concern that pregnant women & children are partic-ularly vulnerable.

n. The ICNIRP safety standards which the UK Government and HPA continue to use fail to recognise the non-thermal, biological effects of microwave radiation. These standards were voted obsolete by the European Parliament, 522 to 16 votes – yet still remain in use in the UK.

18. In the FCC’s mission statement, there is no indication whatsoever of any jurisdiction or mandated protection of men, women, and children for biological and medical harm caused by radiofrequencies.

Please note that terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Notice and Demand to which this Affidavit is attached.

upon my full unlimited commercial liability, do affirm and say that I have read the above Affidavit and do know the contents to the very best of my knowledge to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading; the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

 

 

known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the one whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged execution of the same for the purposes therein contained.

 In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.

upon my full unlimited commercial liability, do affirm and say that I have read the above Affidavit and do know the contents to the very best of my knowledge to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading; the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Before me, the undersigned notary public, this day, appeared , to me known, who being duly sworn according to law, deposes the preceding.

NOTARY PUBLIC

to me known, who being duly sworn according to law, deposes the preceding.

Subscribed and sworn to before me this

NOTARY PUBLIC