RUBRIC FOR DESIGN PROJECT 1
Brace-tag
Design Title
Design of A 13.56MHz Near Field Communication Antenna for Contactless Contact Tracing Device
Team Members
1. Villena, Joshua A. 2. Fernandez, Iasiah P. 3. Soriano, Jethro D.
Team Adviser(s):
Performance Indicators
Poor - 1 Fair - 2 Good - 3 Excellent - 4
I. Problem Statement
1 - No problem statement and no design deliverables.
2 - Problem statement shows little understanding of the problem and few design deliverables are included.
3 - Problem statement shows some understanding of the problem and includes most of the final design deliverables
4 - Problem statement shows full understanding of the problem and clearly includes final design deliverables.
II. Procedure
1- No procedure, tries things out unsystematically
2 - Outlines a general procedure but does not clearly identify methods. No alternative designs are given.
3 - Solution procedure and methods are not always clearly defined. Few alternative designs are evaluated.
4 - Clear definition of solution, procedure and methods. Different alternatives are considered and evaluated.
III. Winning Design
1 - Winning design does not demonstrate the use of any design process, engineering standards, economics to satisfy any design objectives and real-world constraints.
2 - Winning design demonstrates little use of design process, engineering standards, economics to satisfy few design objectives and real-world constraints.
3 - Winning design demonstrates some use of design process, engineering standards, economics to satisfy some design objectives and real-world constraints.
4 - Winning design demonstrates effective use of design process, engineering standards, economics to satisfy design objectives and real-world constraints.
IV. Design Process
1 - No evidence of ability to understand the design requirements, limitations, analyze different alternatives, and provide a feasible design.
2 - Little evidence of ability to understand the design requirements, limitations, analyze different alternatives, and provide a feasible design.
3 - Some evidence of ability to understand the design requirements, limitations, analyze different alternatives, and provide a feasible design.
4 - Clear evidence of ability to understand the design requirements, limitations, analyze different alternatives, and provide a feasible design.
V. Use of Engineering Principles
1 - No evidence of ability to use engineering principles to design components, devices or systems.
2 - Some evidence of ability to use engineering principles to design components, devices or systems.
3 - Some evidence of ability to use engineering principles to design components, devices or systems.
4 - Clear evidence of ability to use engineering principles to design components, devices or systems.
VI. Selection of appropriate tools, skills and techniques in solving the problem
1 - No evidence of ability to select appropriate tools, techniques and skills to solve problems or design a system.
2 - Little evidence of ability to select appropriate tools, techniques and skills to solve problems or design a system.
3 - Some evidence of ability to select appropriate tools, techniques and skills to solve problems or design a system.
4 - Clear evidence of ability to select appropriate tools, techniques and skills to effectively solve problems or design a system.
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score /6)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100%
Evaluated by:
First Name
Last Name
Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Submit
Should be Empty: