RUBRIC FOR PEER EVALUATION
This form is intended to be used as a grading rubric for Peer Evaluation.
Microthink
Team Name
Name of Team Member to be Evaluated
*
Please Select
1. Reyes, Thadeus Aldrin
2. Asejo, Lea
3. Martinez, John Robin
Performance Indicators
Beginning - 1 Progressing - 2 Competent - 3 Advanced - 4
I. Contributions
1 - Rarely offers useful ideas. Is disruptive.
2 - Sometimes offers useful ideas. Rarely displayspositive attitude.
3 - Usually offers useful ideas. Generally displayspositive attitude.
4 - Routinely offers useful ideas. Always displayspositive attitude.
II. Cooperation with Others
1 - Did not do any work. Does not contribute. Does not work well with others.
2 - Sometimes cooperative. Could have shared more of the workload. Requires structure, directions, and leadership.
3 - Usually cooperative. Did own part of workload. Works well with others.
4 - Always cooperative. Did more than others. Highly productive. Works extremely well with others.
III. Focus and Commitments
1 - Often is not a good team member. Does not focus on the task. Let others do the work.
2 - Sometimes focuses on the task. Not always a good team member. Must be prodded and reminded to keep on task.
3 - Does not cause problems in the group. Focuses on the task most of the time. Can count on this person.
4 - Tries to keep people working together. Almost always focused on the task. Is very self-directed.
IV. Team Role Fulfillment
1 - Participates in few or no group meetings. Provides no leadership. Does little or no work assigned by the group.
2 - Participates in some group meetings. Provides some leadership. Does some of the work assigned by the group.
3 - Participates in most group meetings. Provides leadership when asked. Does most of the work assigned by the group.
4 - Participates in all group meetings. Assumes leadership role. Does the work that is assigned by the group.
V. Ability to Communicate
1 - Rarely listens to, shares with, or supports the efforts of others. Never initiate communication with group members or adviser for clarifications Provides no feedback. Does not relay any information to teammates.
2 - Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not initiate communication with group members or adviser for clarifications. Rarely listens to others. Provides little feedback. Relays very little information that relates to the topic.
3 - Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Sometimes initiate communication with group members or adviser for clarifications. Provides some effective feedback. Relays some basic information that relates to the topic.
4 - Always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Initiate communication with group members or adviser for clarifications and relays a lot of relevant information. Provides effective feedback.
VI. Completion of Assigned Tasks
1 - Work is generally sloppy and incomplete, contains excessive errors, and is mostly late.
2 - Work tends to be disorderly, incomplete, inaccurate, and is usually late.
3 - Work is generally complete, meets the requirements of the task, and is mostly done on time.
4 - Work is complete, well-organized, error-free, and done on time or early.
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score /6)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100%
Suggestions and Recommendations
Evaluated By:
*
Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Submit
Should be Empty: