Presentation Rubric
Sophisticated
Competent
Not Yet Complete
Teamwork
(25 Points)
The team worked well
together to achieve
objectives. Each member
contributed in a valuable
way to the project. Teams members each had a role, spoke clearly and maintained eye contact.
The team worked well together
most of the time, with only a few
occurrences of communication
breakdown or failure to
collaborate when appropriate. Not all team members had a clear role.
Team did not collaborate
or communicate well.
Some members would
work independently,
without regard to
objectives or priorities.
Contribution *
(25 Points)
All requirements addressed.
The presentation offered new
information or approach to
the topic under discussion.
Likewise, the application is
based on stated criteria,
analysis and constraints.
All requirements
are not completed.
The presentation offered some
new information or approach to
the topic under discussion. The
application is reasonable;
further analysis of some of the
alternatives or constraints may
have led to a different
approach.
Many requirements and
objectives are not
completed.
The presentation did not respond to the guidelines for the assignment.
Subject
Knowledge**
(25 Points)
The presentation
demonstrated knowledge
of the topic chosen,
integrating major and
minor concepts into the
response. The deliverable
also demonstrated
evidence of extensive
research effort and a depth
of thinking about the topic.
The deliverable demonstrated
knowledge of the course
content by integrating major
concepts into the response. The
deliverable also demonstrated
evidence of limited research
effort and/or initial of thinking
about the topic.
The deliverable did not
demonstrate knowledge of
the course content,
evidence of the research
effort or depth of thinking
about the topic.
Supporting
Material and Evidence ***
(20 Points)
Information shared was relevant to the topic and to the population and was from valid sources.
Theory and rationale for approach were articulated and reasonable.
Sufficient information was
obtained and most sources
were valid. Theory was articulated and application to proposed approach was reasonable.
Insufficient information
was obtained and/or
sources cited lack validity. The application of a specific theory to the rationale for the proposed approach was not articulated.
Composition
(5 Points)
The visual presentation was well organized and presented on UMass Boston PPT template.
Vocabulary was appropriate and college level.
Diagrams or analyses
enhanced and clarified
presentation of ideas.
The visual presentation was well organized for the most part. At times the logic
and/or flow of ideas were
difficult to follow. Words were
well chosen with some minor
expectations. Diagrams were
consistent with the text.
The visual presentation lacked overall organization.
Considerable effort was required to
understand the underlying
logic and flow of ideas.
*Learning objectives are identified
**Health issue and rationale for choice were clearly presented as well as target population and rationale
** *Theory of health behavior change was identified and rationale explained, application of theory was reasonable