7. Very few clear errors in all facets; foul selection, violations, game control and management, signals, communications and presentation were excellent. Allowed the game to flow.
6. Relatively few clear errors; foul selection, violations, game control and management, signals, communications and presentation were very good. Generally allowed the game to flow.
5. Some obvious errors but a low error rate overall. Generally, good judgement shown in most facets including allowing the game to flow, foul selection, violations, game control and management, signals, communications and presentation.
4. Some clear errors but an acceptable error rate overall. Good judgement shown in most facets including allowing the game to flow, foul selection, violations, game control and management, signals, communications and presentation.
3. Several clear errors. Inconsistency in some areas such as such as violations, game control and management, signals, communications and presentation.
2. An inconsistent and/or sloppy performance. Too many errors; inconsistent in several areas in several areas. Improvement expected in your next game.
1. Poor performance: Below the required standard. Inconsistent in several areas: reading the game, violations, game control, signals and communications were generally poor.