16th ANNUAL STROKE & NEUROSCIENCE SYMPOSIUM

16th ANNUAL STROKE & NEUROSCIENCE SYMPOSIUM
“Stroke Heroes”
Continuing Education Activity Evaluation Form
September 20, 2019
Your Email Address (please enter the same on used for registration):
Your JobTitle:
As a learner, please assist in the evaluation of presentations. Please select the number beside each statement that best reflects the extent of your agreement.
5 = totally agree
4 = mostly agree
3 = agree
2 = somewhat agree
1 = disagree.
Decompressive Hemicraniectomy
Jonathan Ratcliff, MD - Medical Director, Neurocritical Care Service, Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5.The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
Palliative Care
Paul DeSandre, MD - Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, Director, Palliative and Supportive Care, Grady Health System
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5.The course objectives were met
12345
COMMENTS:
Rehab After Stroke
Dr. Andrew Dennison, MD. - Medical Director, Acquired Brain Injury Program, Shepherd Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5.The course objectives were met
12345
COMMENTS:
Stroke Research
Meagan L. Schultz, CTCRC - Clinical Research Coordinator II, Emory University School ofMedicine, Department of Neurology, Grady Memorial Hospital – Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5. The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
MSU Crew - A Day in the Life
Carol Fleming, BSN, RN, CCRN - Director, Marcus Stroke Network
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5. The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
Neuro Intervention Update
Raul Nogueira, MD | Director, Neuroendovascular Services, Neurocritical Care Service, Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5. The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
Hemorrhagic Stroke
Jonathan Grossberg, MD - Assistant Professor of Neurology, Neurosurgery, Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Marcus Stroke & Neuroscience Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5. The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
Intimacy After Stroke
Lori J. Sutherly, MS, BSN, RN - BC, SCRN, NVRN | Clinical Research Nurse II Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology Grady Memorial Hospital, Marcus Stroke and Neuroscience Center
1. The presentation was clear and to the point.*
12345
2. The presenters demonstrated mastery of the topic.*
12345
3. The subject matter is important to my professional growth and development.
12345
4. I felt comfortable asking questions.
12345
5. The course objectives were met.
12345
COMMENTS:
OVERALL CONTENT:
1. The content was interesting to me.
12345
2. The content extended my knowledge of the topics.
12345
3. The total time of the course was adequate.
12345
4. The space was conducive to learning.
12345
OTHER COMMENTS:
Thank you for taking the time to complete the evaluation form .
Should be Empty: