- MDMDMAsked on April 21, 2015 at 03:41 PM
I gladly give you the width codes where I found some differences.
It's not the code you found. It's strange: Your code look different than mine.
Under the line <script src="//widgets.jotform.io/substring/substring.min.js"></script> there is another div found in my codes as part of the same parent div as the parent div of the script. See screenshots below:
The selected line is the substring widget that is displayed correctly in my form (it ends with 200 width).
The following line is from a widget field that is not displaying correctly (it ends with "readonly").
You can find my codes on my form at this link:
There could be / it looks like there is a connection between width differences (only in the source code, not in the Jotform settings) and differences between the way the fields are displayed.
With kind regards,
- JotForm SupportWelvinAnswered on April 21, 2015 at 03:56 PM
A ticket is now created and submitted to our developers for review. Thank you for taking the time in explaining these things to us, that is very much appreciated. If there are updates, you should know it via this thread.
Here are my findings as well:
As you could see it, the width properties is present in the first input box of the widget, but not in the second one.
- JotForm SupportTitusNAnswered on April 28, 2015 at 05:35 AM
The issue is now fixed - any width set from the form builder will be reflected on the substring widget you have on your form:
Please check it out: http://form.jotformeu.com/form/51064047899363?
Let us know if you experience further challenges - we'll be happy to help.